|
 |
| fig.8:
Historic exteriors,
|
|
modern
interiors |
|
 |
| fig
9: The neo-traditional |
|
facades
of the Saifi area |
|
 |
| fig
10: The new shops
of
|
|
|
DECONSTRUCTING
BEIRUT'S RECONSTRUCTION: 1990 - 2000
Coming to Terms with the Colonial Heritage
An essay on a public lecture presented by Robert Saliba at Darat
al-Funun, Amman on April 19, 2000. --continued--
MODERNIZING HERITAGE
Saliba moved on to discuss two approaches towards preservation. The
first is that of preserving the urban fabric, i.e. the pattern of
streets, parcels, and buildings, and the second is emphasizing the
preservation of the buildings themselves. In the case of the
reconstruction of the Beirut Central District, the French Mandate
section was preserved both as urban fabric and as buildings. On the
other hand, the Saifi and Wadi abu-Jamil areas were preserved as
street pattern, while their parcels and buildings were partially
modified. In the final result, about 20% of the central business
district was preserved in terms of urban fabric and buildings.
When dealing with the preservation of an urban fabric, one needs to
address three dialectical relationships. The first is that of "above
versus below;" where the main issue is urban archaeology versus
underground parking. The second is that of "inside versus
outside," where the main issue is historic public frontages
versus modernized interiors. The third is that of "the existing
versus the potential," where the main issue is the existing
development versus vertical or horizontal extension of construction.
In the area of the Solidere project, religious buildings were
mostly preserved from both the inside and outside. The exteriors of
public buildings - such as the parliament and municipality buildings
- were kept, and the interiors were partially modernized. However,
the Grand Serail, a late Ottoman structure, was vertically extended
through the addition of a new floor. Also, the inside was completely
rebuilt according to modern standards, thus reducing the original
building to a mere envelope in which new elements are placed.
Although the new modifications are both imposing and well executed,
a number of the elements added to the main elevation, such as the
dormers on the red tile roof, jeopardized the original character of
the building, especially for those who had memories of the Grand
Serail from before the war. Preservation from outside and
modernization from within was applied to the majority of office
buildings in the conservation area. This usually included the
integration of elevators and other modern necessities, and the
adoption of flexible open plans (figure 8). Outside the central
district area, another recent example where a similar strategy was
applied is College Hall at the American University of Beirut. This
prominent campus building was completely reconstituted from the
outside and rebuilt from within incorporating the latest modern
necessities.
Another category that Saliba addressed is that of infill buildings,
where one is presented with two solutions. The first is to create a
"neo-historical" structure that emulates surrounding
buildings, and the second is to develop a contemporary design that
adapts to the scale of the surrounding context, but not necessarily
to its architectural character. Saliba noted that both solutions
have been adopted in the Solidere project.
An example of the first approach is found in the Saifi area, where
one is presented with "neo-traditional" infill
architecture (figure 9). Saliba qualifies these buildings as
pastiche architecture, where one often comes across contradictions
between plans and elevations. Here, the designers wished to maintain
the symmetrical central hall elevation characteristic of the
traditional Beiruti house, which did not correspond to the
building's modern plan, and therefore residual spaces resulted from
this arrangement. An example of the second approach is found at the
intersection of Weygand and Allenby streets, where an infill corner
building continues the arcade alignment of one of the streets but
exhibits a glass wall along the other street.
Concerning the duality between above and below, Saliba cited the
example of the Suq Tawilah area (figure 10). Here, parking areas
were needed for the modern shopping mall to be constructed at the
location of the late Ottoman suqs. The result is what Saliba
identified as "skin-deep historicism," where the late
Ottoman street pattern was recreated over the concrete slab of the
parking structure.
Saliba deduced that we are presented with a wide range of responses
to the issue of heritage conservation. In the case of Beirut, there
is a considerable difference between the generally high standards
reached by Solidere in its conservation area, and the cheap
face-lifting solutions being implemented in the peri-center
districts. Of course, attempting to apply such quality control on
the scale of the city would be difficult to realize because of
financial and technical complications.
Saliba added that the experience of the reconstruction process has
been an extremely rich one. Over the past ten years, those observing
or involved in such projects have had to revise their own
assumptions about reconstruction, preservation, and the ideological
positions underlying the notion of heritage. In this context, Saliba
mentioned the remarks made by the AUB architectural faculty member,
Marwan Ghandour, who commented that the architectural discourse in
post-colonial societies is fundamentally attempting different ways
of interpreting or identifying what can be viewed as an authentic
local identity. In this discourse, traditional buildings are the
principle narrators of that identity (7).
Ghandour denounces the futility of such attempts, which view history
as consisting of two opposite forces, the eras of pre-modernization
and post-modernization, both of which are connected to the process
of colonization. With this, Saliba concluded by stating that in the
case of the reconstruction of Beirut, we see a clear example of the
incorporation of the colonial legacy into national heritage. To
Saliba, this leads to the conclusion that maybe we are coming to
terms with our "hybrid personalities," thus transcending
the duality between the authentic and the colonial in favor of a "new
authenticity."
|